|
|
Post by doink619 on May 29, 2009 23:50:40 GMT -5
The following is from WWE.com:
Mr. Kennedy released
Written: May 29, 2009
World Wrestling Entertainment has come to terms on the release of Raw Superstar Mr. Kennedy (Ken Kennedy) as of today, May 29, 2009. WWE wishes Ken the best in all future endeavors.
|
|
|
|
Post by anfguy on May 30, 2009 8:04:26 GMT -5
He'll be back in TNA in 90 days, no doubt. JON MOXLEY vs. KEN KENNEDY....BOOK IT!  |
|
|
|
Post by tealpoint5 on May 30, 2009 8:26:47 GMT -5
Well, his comeback was good while it lasted. And yes, anfguy, I definetley agree that he'll be in TNA so who isn't excited for that? Oh yeah, Moxley vs. Kennedy would be a good match. I second it...BOOK THE MATCH !  |
|
|
|
Post by BleachMoxley on Jun 1, 2009 16:01:09 GMT -5
We'll probably never know what the true reason of what Kennedy's release is, but this entire publicity of Kennedy's release, and the subsequent conditions surrounding it can only do one thing for the morale of the troops on Raw, and on the other two brands, and that is, make everyone paranoid. What would happen if the next midcarder goes up against a main eventer, botches a spot, nobody gets hurt, but this main eventer goes and complains to Orton or Triple H, or someone like that. Is that going to result in that midcarder getting fired? It's a precedent that makes WWE an extremely (pardon the ECW pun) volatile place to consider employment, and will make the talent, I would suspect, be a little more reserved while performing, in order to insure that nobody else suffers what appears to have been a "Kennedy." I still say this whole situation is truly pathetic. I would love to see Kennedy end up in TNA, show he's healthy, and win championship gold in a hurry, just to smear egg on the faces of WWE brass. It would be absolute poetic justice. All very true. I would also like to see him go to TNA if WWE doesn't take him back randomly. It would be funny to see him win gold over at TNA real quick and shove it in WWE (Vince's) face. |
|
|
|
Post by truefanofwrestling on Jun 5, 2009 9:14:07 GMT -5
Wow this Kennedy episode sounds very familiar, but lets look at what everyone has said.
Basically, no one knows what really happened. Im sorry but that last little statement by the WWE reported by ghostwriter seems like a cop out to me.
You know everyone is wondering, why would you get rid of this talented guy? So put the word out there that he was a troublemaker and everyone hated him anyway, or the famous, if he didnt do something so big, like the movie, he would have been gone anyway.
Sorry, someone who doesnt fall for the spin can see right through that.
Think about how Vince got rid of Brett Hart. Why would he reserve himself to get rid of him at any point of his contract? Vince's ego would not allow such reserve.
Now a lot of you speak on his in ring ability. Well who isnt clumsy and who doesnt make mistakes at the point he is at his career. Yes the 10 man tag was a mistake by the company, but expecting perfection from someone that has been on and off like he has is like asking Greg Carey to loose 10 lbs.!!!
I have to diagree with some, I do and can see him in TNA. I really think that this is the offset that could make the company whole. His personna could help boost TNA a great deal and bring a whole different fan to TNA and make it more diverse.
I see it as a group of wrestlers were jealous because of the rising star that would surpass them. They wanted to stay on top, or rise to the spot and have the opportunites that he was able to get and they got rid of him to step up the ladder.
Again, sounds very familiar!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by anfguy on Jun 5, 2009 9:59:46 GMT -5
A true fan of wrestling would know that the Hitman's first name is spelled "Bret", not "Brett".
|
|
ipwjoe
Junior Member
Posts: 73
|
Post by ipwjoe on Jun 7, 2009 10:33:52 GMT -5
A true fan of wrestling would know that the Hitman's first name is spelled "Bret", not "Brett". LOL......... |
|
